Fee Dispute Hotline
(312) 907-7275

Assisting with High-Stakes Attorney Fee Disputes


News Blog

Judge Reduces Fees in FTC Case that Settled Without Liability Admission

December 19, 2012 | Posted in : Fee Award, Fee Reduction

A recent New Jersey Law Journal story, Venable’s Fees Slashed in FTC Suit Settled Without Liability Admission” reports that a judge who balked at $2 million Federal Trade Commission settlement that included no admission of wrongdoing by the defendant, and then approved it with unusual conditions, has ordered that some of the money go to defense counsel Venable for fees.  But U.S. District Judge Renee Bumb slashed the fee request by almost half, finding misplaced the firm’s reliance on a National Law Journal survey of billing rates to show its fees were reasonable, rather than submitting affidavits from lawyers practicing in the relevant market: southern New Jersey.

“[T]his court affords no value to that value to the survey because it (1) is unsworn and based on self-reported figures by firms; (2) provides only a broad range of attorney’s fees, without regard to the nature of the work performed or experience or skill of those performing it; and (3) contains no information as to reasonable rates for non-attorney personnel,” Bumb said in a decision handed down Monday.  She held Venable was entitled to $129,095 in fees, a bit more than half the $250,077 it sought, on top of the $150,000 in retainer fees already paid.

The case, FTC v, Circa Direct, accused Circa Direct and its principal, Andrew Davidson, of using fake online news sites to market acai berry diet products.  The sites, with addresses like onlinenews6.com, were designed to resemble legitimate news portals, featuring purportedly objective reports by fictional reporters and commentators about dramatic weight loss achieved using acai berry.

In February, the FTC asked Bumb to approve a settlement that would make an injunction permanent and impose an $11.5 million judgment, which would be suspended if the defendants provided honest information about their financial condition and turned over assets valued at more than $2 million.  The settlement said it was without admission or finding of wrongdoing or liability.  Although judges routinely approve settlements where no one admits doing anything wrong, Bumb balked.

On Sept 11, Bumb approved the Circa Direct settlement, swayed by the FTC’s argument that otherwise it would have to spend a lot of time and money trying the case.  But she conditioned approval on the FTC creating a web page by Oct. 12 that would put the allegations “before the public for evaluation and discussion.”  The settlement said a portion of the client funds Venable was then holding in escrow could be used to pay its “fees and costs reasonably incurred” for work in the case, contingent on FTC approval or court order.

The fee request included charges for Edwin Larkin, who typically bills at $800 per hour, fellow partner Thomas Cohn, $650, and associate Heather Maly, $416, all of them in New York.  Venable discounted those rates to $600 for partners and $300 for associates, but they were still too high for Bumb.  Saying she was exercising her discretion, she set rates of $400 an hour for Larkin and Cohn, $375 for a less-experienced partner, and $275 for Maly and another fourth-year associate.

She called those rates reasonable in light of other fee applications granted in the district and what the FTC conceded was reasonable in declarations it submitted opposing Venable’s fee request.  She concluded that Venable was entitled to a total of $279,095, $150,000 of which had already been paid, resulting in the $129,095 award.