October 1, 2021
A federal judge has cited a NALFA survey in a class action attorney fee award. U.S. District Judge Amos L. Mazzant of the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas referenced NALFA’s hourly rate survey in awarding attorney fees and expenses in Cone v. Porcelana Corona de Mexico, S.A.de C.V. et. al (“Vortens”). The NALFA survey independently showed prevailing market rate data of class counsel in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
“To support its submitted rates, Class Counsel commissioned and submitted a survey conducted by the National Association of Legal Fee Analysis ("NALFA"). The sample of the NALFA survey was Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area plaintiffs’ counsel practicing in consumer related or product liability class-action work. Class Counsel’s submitted hourly rates, while on the higher side, falls within the accepted range,” wrote Judge Mazzant.
NALFA conducts custom hourly rates for clients such as law firms to independently prove billing rates in court. Lead plaintiffs’ counsel commissioned NALFA to conduct a billing rate survey of plaintiffs’ rates in class actions in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. NALFA conducted this survey via email, employing its best practices measures. In his 26-page fee order (pdf), Judge Mazzant accepted the hourly rate data and survey results and awarded over $4.3 million in attorney fees in the Vortens class settlement.