Fee Dispute Hotline
(312) 907-7275

Assisting with High-Stakes Attorney Fee Disputes

The NALFA

News Blog

Water District Struggles to Pay its Legal Bills

May 15, 2015 | Posted in : Defense Fees / Costs, Expenses / Costs, Hourly Rates, Legal Bills / Legal Costs, Legal Spend

A recent L.A. Times story, “Water District Found Itself Drowning in Steep Legal Fees,” reports that, facing a lawsuit from cities over its pumping rates, the Water Replenishment District of Southern California (WRD) called in the big guns.  Latham & Watkins – a blue chip, international law firm with more than 2,000 lawyers – would be the “bazooka” the agency needed, director Albert Robles said.

“I wanted to intimidate the cities,” said Board President Robert Katherman.  But that strategy come with a price: Latham & Watkins charged hourly rates of $285 for a paralegal up to $790 for a senior partner, according to district records.  Aleshire & Wynder – the firms representing the cities of Downey, Cerritos, Signal Hill and Bellflower – charged $150 and $300 for the same services.

In a span of 10 months, Latham & Watkins billed the district more than $5 million in legal fees, according to invoices.  That was about $1 million more than what the cities were charged by attorneys over five years.  “In a way, I’m glad they brought that firm in,” said attorney David Aleshire, who represented the cities.  “Maybe they thought we’d just roll over and surrender but we were operating under rates that would allow us to go all the way.

Director, John Allen, who joined the Water Replenishment District board in January, said he was stunned by the legal fees, calling them “unsustainable.”  “It became apparent we were going to sign checks larger than what these cities were suing us for,” he said.  Two weeks ago, the WRD settled the case, agreeing to pay the cities that sued it $9.1 million.

The WRD ended up exceeding its $2 billion litigation budget for 2014-15 by almost double, according to district officials.